DUTIES:
1) Assigned tasks for screening group
2) Organized viewings of previous years' reels for analysis
3) Attended above reel viewings and combined gathered data from viewings
4) Organized and led Fall work jury
5) Counted up votes from Fall jury and determined entries into reel - 50%
6) Contacted creators of accepted work to finalize submission process
7) Gathered info documents from creators for first deadline in order to better prepare for Spring jury
8) Organized and led Spring work jury
9) Counted up votes from Spring jury and determined entries into reel - 33%
10) Finalized reel entries and contacted creators
11) Created master list and final reel layout of works in the reel
12) Edited VIP reel - 50%
13) Edited Screening reel - 50%
14) Gathered info for credits of reel
15) Set-up lights in Federal Building exhibition - 33%
16) Oversaw setup of Screening event, screening guide handouts, band setup & takedown, monitored sound and projector during screening event - 80%
17) Breakdown of Screening equipment - 20%
18) Unloaded truck at Langford after exhbition breakdown - 33%
19) Created catalog images for Web catalog
3 THINGS THAT WENT WELL:
1) the screening event went amazingly smooth, no serious mistakes and there were plenty of people to help out willingly and cheerfully
2) Juries went well, no complaining and work was juried fairly
3) Creation of screening reel went smoothly: interstitial handoff deadlines were kept and reel was finished with time to spare before the event.
3 THINGS THAT DID NOT GO WELL:
1) Class reel guidelines were not followed. A number of people told me that they wish some of the class reels had had explanations so they could understand what was going on. The class reels that had audio explanations were successful, the ones that didn't were not successful.
2) Sometimes class felt like it was only for the working group leads. The "minions" didn't seem to get as much love as the leads did and therefore didn't feel class was as beneficial to them.
3) Sometimes I got bored in class. I think ice cream and cake would have helped liven things up. :)
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Thursday, May 3, 2012
UPDATE 5/3
FINAL SCREENING REEL COMPLETE!
Final run time: 1 hr 11 min
Breakdown: 37 student works, 5 class reels, 3 summer course projects, 4 interstitials w/ bumpers, 1 credits
Final reel layout created by me:
Final run time: 1 hr 11 min
Breakdown: 37 student works, 5 class reels, 3 summer course projects, 4 interstitials w/ bumpers, 1 credits
Final reel layout created by me:
1)
Interstitial 1
2)
A Moonlit Story – Jeff Gustafson, Stephanie Keske, Landon
Hagan, Christopher Simmons, Jose “Weecho” Velasquez, Jared Wright
3)
Waldo – Garrett Broussard, Jacob Zimmer
4)
VIZA 613 Class Reel
5)
Leo Rigging Demo – Junze Zhou
6)
The Moon and the Well
- Kelly Kin
7)
Pan’s Panicking Encounter – Siran Liu
8)
Downtown Bryan – Jessica Krannitz
9)
Sphere-It – David Monroe, Tyler Rosas
10)
Minitaur – Rachel Cunningham
11)
Pandora’s Box – Brian Smith
12)
Space Madness – Jared Wright
13)
VIZA 615 Class Reel
14)
Interstitial 2
15)
Night Shift – Spencer Cureton, Brandon Jarratt, Jessica Krannitz,
Kate Pettijohn, Junze Zhou
16)
Silent Project – Caleb Jackson, Sean Low, Megan Walker
17)
Shading Projects – Man Li
18)
The Unstoppable Force – Tim Withers
19)
Obstruction Eight – Brandon Jarratt
20)
2012 – R.J. Pena
21)
Siegfried – Caleb Jackson
22)
Renewal – Emma Carlson
23)
Mind Adjustment – Jake Ross
24)
Sleddin’ – John Pettingill, Junze Zhou, Man Li, Suruchi
Sharma, Sean Low
25)
Giraffe Rig Demo – Junze Zhou
26)
An Unfortunate Demise – Jessica Krannitz
27)
VIZA 616 Class Reel
28)
Bait Ball – Michael Catalano
29)
Laser Beam FX – Brandon Jarratt
30)
Interstitial 3
31)
After Hours – Man Li, Kendall Litaker, Logan Kelly, Anahita
Salimi, Michael Catalano
32)
2C1F – Sean Low
33)
The Hunt for QuetzalCoatl – Jake Ross
34)
Obstruction Four – Jeff Gustafson, Brandon Jarratt, Jon
Kranzler
35)
Armless Gang – Anahita Salimi
36)
Knitmare – Trisha Cleveland, Rachel Cunningham, Kelly Kin,
Christine Li
37)
VIZA 659 Class Reel
38)
Cellular Automata in Motion – Landon Hagan
39)
Promoter Rig – Logan Kelly
40)
Galletas Clandestines – Jose “Weecho” Velasquez
41)
How Quad Can You Be? – Sean Low
42)
Isosurface Growth – Sarah Beth Eisenger
43)
VIZA 656 Class Reel
44)
Zompire – Jared Wright
45)
Pygmalion – Christine Li
46)
Along Came Polly – Jacob Zimmer
47)
Unexpected – John Pettingill
48)
Eden – Jonny Greenwald, Ganesh Rao
49)
Interstitial 4
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Update 4/30
-I was at the Lab on sunday, 4/29 from 1pm to 3am editing the reel for the VIPs. Some people hadn't finished their class reels so we spent alot of time waiting for them to finish.
-Monday 4/29: VIP Reel is finished!!
-I was at the Lab on Monday, 4/30 from 4pm to 1am with a little break in between making final edits on the reel's video. Audio work still needs to be done.
-Monday 4/29: VIP Reel is finished!!
-I was at the Lab on Monday, 4/30 from 4pm to 1am with a little break in between making final edits on the reel's video. Audio work still needs to be done.
Saturday, April 28, 2012
Update 4/28
SPRING WORK WAS JURIED TODAY!
THE FINAL REEL BREAKDOWN IS COMPLETE!!
THE FINAL REEL BREAKDOWN IS COMPLETE!!
Student Work: 37 works
Class reels: 7.5 minutes
Summer Course projects: 1.5 minutes
Interstitials: 13 minutes
Total: 1 hr, 5 minutes
Student work Category Breakdown:
Animation: 14
Technical: 12
Video: 11
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Update 4/22
-Vizagogo entry documents were due today, here is what the reel breakdown would be if everything was accepted:
Student Work: approx. 90 minutes
Class reels: 7.5 minutes
Summer Course projects: 2 minutes
Interstitials: 13 minutes
Total: 112.5 minutes = 1 hr, 52 minutes, 30 seconds
Monday, April 9, 2012
UPDATE 4/8
-Reviewed David's reel draft, gave approval.
-Spoke with Jared regarding length of interstitial time. Will discuss more in class.
-Wrote up and sent out email over VIZA MSGS regarding VizaGoGo submission guidelines. Will send out again every week leading up to deadlines.
-Spoke with Garrett about needs from Technical Group. He will keep Screening updated on any needs on his end.
-Emailed Glen about DVD costs, he only says they need the one DVD, which they will provide.
-Assigned Chris to the duty of handling consistency of class reels, and contacting and giving the professors that information.
Things to bring up:
-Surveys after show?
-DVD case and insert covered by whom?
-Spoke with Jared regarding length of interstitial time. Will discuss more in class.
-Wrote up and sent out email over VIZA MSGS regarding VizaGoGo submission guidelines. Will send out again every week leading up to deadlines.
-Spoke with Garrett about needs from Technical Group. He will keep Screening updated on any needs on his end.
-Emailed Glen about DVD costs, he only says they need the one DVD, which they will provide.
-Assigned Chris to the duty of handling consistency of class reels, and contacting and giving the professors that information.
Things to bring up:
-Surveys after show?
-DVD case and insert covered by whom?
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Divying Out Responsibilities - 3/26
This week I took advantage of having a few underlings under my wing and doled out some responsibilities. I charged Chris Potter with contacting every faculty member and determining whether or not they would require space in the screening for a class reel. I charged David Monroe with creating a screening reel draft that would help us figure out the timing and pacing of our reel thus far. I will then look over the draft, making changes where necessary.
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
VIZAGOGO 17 & 18 Breakdown - 3/21
The following are observations of the Screening Group concerning the different aspects of previous years' VizaGoGo reels:
VizaGoGo 17:
Total Length: 1 hr, 7 min
Total Interstitials: 5
Average Interstitial Run Time: 1 min, 24 sec
Total Interstitial Run Time: 7 min
Class Reels: 8 (3 technical vs. 5 artistic)
Student Works: 28
Summer Course Projects: 4
Total Works: 40
Extras: 1 (summer course project video)
VizaGoGo 18:
VizaGoGo 17:
Total Length: 1 hr, 7 min
Total Interstitials: 5
Average Interstitial Run Time: 1 min, 24 sec
Total Interstitial Run Time: 7 min
Class Reels: 8 (3 technical vs. 5 artistic)
Student Works: 28
Summer Course Projects: 4
Total Works: 40
Extras: 1 (summer course project video)
VizaGoGo 18:
Total Length: 1 hr, 2 min
Total Interstitials: 6
Total Interstitial Run Time: 6 min, 8 sec
Class Reels: 6 (2 technical vs. 4 artistic)
Student Works: 40
Summer Course Projects: 3
Total Works: 49
Extras: 1 (artist in residence video)
Review VizaGoGo 17: 3/7
Some of the Screening Group members (David Monroe, Chris Potter, and myself) reviewed the reel for VizaGoGo 17 from Spring 2010. This was a continuation of our study from last week in order to get a better idea as to what this year's reel should be like in terms of length, style, content, etc. The following are the observations I made:
- Final run time: 1 hour, 7 minutes
- Final run time: 1 hour, 7 minutes
- Started out with a video from the summer course
- 5 total interstitials
- Interstitials averaged to around 1:30 each.
- There were bumpers before each interstitial indicating a separation from student work.
- 5 total interstitials
- Interstitials averaged to around 1:30 each.
- There were bumpers before each interstitial indicating a separation from student work.
- The bumpers were done very effectively, and added to the reel.
- 8 total class reels, interspersed throughout. Some were good, some not so good, but done better than Vizagogo 18
- 4 total summer course projects, interspersed throughout
-Student work shown in groups of 1-4, interspersed throughout
-Artist in Residence course video not included, but video about summer course was
- 8 total class reels, interspersed throughout. Some were good, some not so good, but done better than Vizagogo 18
- 4 total summer course projects, interspersed throughout
-Student work shown in groups of 1-4, interspersed throughout
-Artist in Residence course video not included, but video about summer course was
-End credits had behind-the-scenes photography of filming interstitials, and this added alot to the credits. Very effective.
Things to find out about:
1) How are we going to include class reels?
2) Are there any other video "extras" that will be included this year?
Things to find out about:
1) How are we going to include class reels?
2) Are there any other video "extras" that will be included this year?
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Jurying of Fall Works: 3/2
Jurying of Fall Work took place on Friday, 3/2 at 10:30AM-12:30PM in the curved room.
I organized the event, printed out handouts for jurors to write on, and tallied up votes afterwards with Chris Potter.
Below is a review of the jurying itself, as well as the juried works:
-9 people showed up to jury, the group consisted of a mix of class reps, working group leaders, and screening group members.
-There were 19 works that were considered to have a majority in favor, meaning they got a 6:3 ratio or higher. These works will, unless otherwise specified in the future, be on the reel.
-There were 12 "Maybes", meaning the works had a ratio of 5:4 or 4:5. These works will be kept on file until after the Jurying of Spring Work, when their inclusion into the show will be determined based on available space.
-Class representation for selected projects is as follows:
Things to find out about:
1) If a project won an award or was exhibited somewhere, should it get automatic admission?
2) If the student no longer attends the University, should his work be considered?
3) CLASS REELS????
I organized the event, printed out handouts for jurors to write on, and tallied up votes afterwards with Chris Potter.
Below is a review of the jurying itself, as well as the juried works:
-9 people showed up to jury, the group consisted of a mix of class reps, working group leaders, and screening group members.
-There were 19 works that were considered to have a majority in favor, meaning they got a 6:3 ratio or higher. These works will, unless otherwise specified in the future, be on the reel.
-There were 12 "Maybes", meaning the works had a ratio of 5:4 or 4:5. These works will be kept on file until after the Jurying of Spring Work, when their inclusion into the show will be determined based on available space.
-Class representation for selected projects is as follows:
- VIZA 613: 9
- VIZA 643: 3
- VIZA 622: 2
- VIZA 654: 2
- Independent: 2
- VIZA 685: 1
Things to find out about:
1) If a project won an award or was exhibited somewhere, should it get automatic admission?
2) If the student no longer attends the University, should his work be considered?
3) CLASS REELS????
Review VizaGoGo 18: 2/29
Wednesday, 2/29
Some of the Screening Group members reviewed the previous year's reel for VizaGoGo 18. We did this in order to get a better idea as to what this year's reel should be like in terms of length, style, content, etc. The following are the observations I made:
-Final run time: 1 hour, 2 minutes
-6 total interstitials
-First and last interstitials were the longest at around 3 minutes each
-Middle 4 interstitials were rather short, more like bumpers than anything else. About 20 seconds each
-6 total class reels, interspersed throughout. Some were good, some not so good
- 3 total summer course projects, interspersed throughout
-Student work shown in groups of 3-6, interspersed throughout
-Artist in Residence course video included
Things to find out about:
1) Where do we get Summer Course 2011 projects to include in the show?
2) Are we going to do class reels?
3) Are we going to include an Artist in Residence or "Idea Lab" video this year?
Some of the Screening Group members reviewed the previous year's reel for VizaGoGo 18. We did this in order to get a better idea as to what this year's reel should be like in terms of length, style, content, etc. The following are the observations I made:
-Final run time: 1 hour, 2 minutes
-6 total interstitials
-First and last interstitials were the longest at around 3 minutes each
-Middle 4 interstitials were rather short, more like bumpers than anything else. About 20 seconds each
-6 total class reels, interspersed throughout. Some were good, some not so good
- 3 total summer course projects, interspersed throughout
-Student work shown in groups of 3-6, interspersed throughout
-Artist in Residence course video included
Things to find out about:
1) Where do we get Summer Course 2011 projects to include in the show?
2) Are we going to do class reels?
3) Are we going to include an Artist in Residence or "Idea Lab" video this year?
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Screening Group schedule addendum 2/23
FEBRUARY 26TH:
-Deadline for submitting work for jurying from Fall semester.
MARCH 2:
-Jury works from Fall Show,
-Get progress report from Interstitial Group
MARCH 9:
-Get progress report from Interstitial Group
MARCH 16:
-Get progress report from Interstitial Group
MARCH 23:
-Get progress report from Interstitial Group
MARCH 30:
-Get progress report from Interstitial Group
APRIL 6:
-Get progress report from Interstitial Group
-Check in with Technical Group concerning needs from Screening Group
APRIL 6:
-Get progress report from Interstitial Group
-Check in with Technical Group concerning needs from Screening Group
APRIL 13:
-Get progress report from Interstitial Group
-Check in with Technical Group concerning needs from Screening Group
APRIL 20:
-Get progress report from Interstitial Group
-Check in with Technical Group concerning needs from Screening Group
APRIL 22:
-8 AM deadline for Spring Semester work to be juried.
-Jury submitted work
APRIL 23:
-Get finalized interstitials from Interstitial Group
-Begin editing final reel for show
APRIL 27:
-Check in with Technical Group concerning needs from Screening Group
APRIL 30:
-Final Reel completed
-MAY 1 THRU MAY 4:
-Coordinate with Technical Group for setting up show.
OTHER UPDATES:
-Set up submission process for Fall semester work.
-Set deadline for Sunday, February 26th.
-In contact with Screening Group, Group leaders, and Class Reps to determine best day for jurying Fall work.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Screening Group update 2/15
-After group leader meeting the schedule for the screening group is now as follows:
Screening Group Schedule Weeks 4 & 5 (Feb 5th – Feb 18th) Collect work from Fall Show. Jury work from Fall Show. Weeks 6 & 7 (Feb 19th – Mar 3rd) Continue jurying works from Fall Show.
Transfer juried works from Fall Show to "Dash" Contact interstitial group to determine filming progress and shot lengths. Weeks 7 & 8 (Mar 4th – Mar 17th) Coordinate with interstitial group and get updates on progress. Look at previous vizagogo and record lengths of various segments. Weeks 8 & 9 (Mar 18th – Mar 31st) Coordinate with interstitial group and get updates on progress. Create rough outline of vizagogo segments and interstitial placement. Weeks 10 & 11 (Apr 1st – Apr 14th) Coordinate with interstitial group for inclusion of their work.
Coordinate with technical group for updates on progress Weeks 12 & 13 (Apr 15th – Apr 28th) April 22 @ 8 AM - Deadline for works created in Spring Semester.
Jury submitted work
Assemble juried work, begin layout and timing. Work with Glen for editing and completing the master tape. Coordinate with interstitial group for inclusion of their work. Weeks 13 & 14 (Apr 29th – May 5th)
Creation of DVDs for the show and DVD for VIPs/ILM. Provide on stage and other logistical support for screening event. Make sure everything is prepared and runs smoothly. Coordinate with technical group for projectors and screening. Coordinate with exhibition group if necessary for screening event. Responsibilities Policy and publication for submission process - Jake Assembling of juried works - Jake Curating submissions - entire group, working group leaders, class reps Coordination with interstitial group - Chris and Jared, overseen by Jake Creation of DVD for show - Jared and David, overseen by Jake Creation of DVD for VIPs - Chris, overseen by Jake On stage support day of show - entire group
Other Updates:
-Coordinated with class reps and working group leaders to determine best time and place for jurying Fall show works
-contacted Glen concerning retrieval of Fall Show works.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Screening Group Tentative Schedule
Screening Group Schedule Weeks 4 & 5 (Feb 5th – Feb 18th) Collect work from Fall Show. Jury work from Fall Show. Weeks 6 & 7 (Feb 19th – Mar 3rd) Continue collecting work from Fall show. Continue jurying works from Fall Show. Contact interstitial group to determine filming progress and shot lengths. Weeks 7 & 8 (Mar 4th – Mar 17th) Coordinate with interstitial group. Collect any finished interstitial video clips. Look at previous vizagogo and record lengths of various segments. Weeks 8 & 9 (Mar 18th – Mar 31st) Collect remaining interstitial video clips. Create rough outline of vizagogo segments and interstitial placement. Weeks 10 & 11 (Apr 1st – Apr 14th) First deadline for works created in Spring Semester. Create list of projects expected to be submitted for second deadline. Jury works submitted, leaving room for submissions to second deadline. Jury works submitted – leave room for submissions from second deadline. Coordinate with interstitial group for inclusion of their work. Weeks 12 & 13 (Apr 15th – Apr 28th) Last deadline for works created in Spring Semester. Assemble juried work, begin layout and timing. Work with Glen for editing and completing the master tape. Coordinate with interstitial group for inclusion of their work. Creation of DVDs for the show and DVD for VIPs/ILM. Coordinate with technical group for projectors and screening. Weeks 13 & 14 (Apr 29th – May 12th) Provide on stage and other logistical support for screening event. Make sure everything is prepared and runs smoothly. Coordinate with technical group for projectors and screening. Coordinate with exhibition group if necessary for screening event. Responsibilities Policy and publication for submission process - Jake Assembling of juried works - Jake Curating submissions - entire group Coordination with interstitial group - Chris and Jared, overseen by Jake Creation of DVD for show - Jared and David, overseen by Jake Creation of DVD for VIPs - Chris, overseen by Jake On stage support day of show - entire group
Monday, February 6, 2012
Screening Group Meeting #1
TEAM MEMBERS:
-Jake Ross (lead)
-David Monroe
-Chris Potter
-Jared Wright
MEETING TOPICS:
-Responsibilities
-Policy and publication for submission process - Jake
-assembling of juried works - Jake
-Curating submissions - entire group
-Coordination with interstitial group - Chris and Jared, overseen by Jake
-Creation of DVD for show - Jared and David, overseen by Jake
-Creation of DVD for VIPs - Chris, overseen by Jake
-Onstage support day of show provided by entire group
-Scheduling
-Weeks 4-6
-Coordination with interstitial group where needed
-Collect works from Fall Show.
-Weeks 7-8
-Coordination with interstitial group where needed
-Jury works from Fall Show
-Weeks 9-11
-Coordination with interstitial group where needed
-First deadline for works created in Spring Semester
-Create list of projects expected to be submitted for second deadline
-Jury works submitted, leaving room for submissions to second deadline
-Weeks 12-15
-Last deadline for works created in Spring Semester
-Jury works submitted
-Creation of DVDs for show and VIPs
-Install screening for show
-Jake Ross (lead)
-David Monroe
-Chris Potter
-Jared Wright
MEETING TOPICS:
-Responsibilities
-Policy and publication for submission process - Jake
-assembling of juried works - Jake
-Curating submissions - entire group
-Coordination with interstitial group - Chris and Jared, overseen by Jake
-Creation of DVD for show - Jared and David, overseen by Jake
-Creation of DVD for VIPs - Chris, overseen by Jake
-Onstage support day of show provided by entire group
-Scheduling
-Weeks 4-6
-Coordination with interstitial group where needed
-Collect works from Fall Show.
-Weeks 7-8
-Coordination with interstitial group where needed
-Jury works from Fall Show
-Weeks 9-11
-Coordination with interstitial group where needed
-First deadline for works created in Spring Semester
-Create list of projects expected to be submitted for second deadline
-Jury works submitted, leaving room for submissions to second deadline
-Weeks 12-15
-Last deadline for works created in Spring Semester
-Jury works submitted
-Creation of DVDs for show and VIPs
-Install screening for show
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Vizagogo Theme - Clue / Murder Mystery
Characters:
Plot for 5 Interstitials:
1 - Five characters are assembled for a VIZ meeting in the dining room of Tim's mansion. They are each given a weapon (Gun, Knife, Nunchakus, Rope, Bread). All of the sudden, the lights go out, the characters hear noises (fumbling and a gunshot), and when the lights return, Tim is found dead. The characters are all confused and begin accusing each other.
2 - During the accusations, the characters begin exploring the mansion a bit. The Jock finds himself in the library, where he is promptly grabbed from behind and screams like a little girl.
3 - When the three remaining characters enter the library, they find the Jock hung by the rope! (only show hanging feet and rope tied to ceiling to keep it PG-13, no face or neck) The characters all turn to look at the Hipster, who had been given the rope, but she exclaims that she had forgotten it in the dining room when the meeting was first assembled! Fed up with the others and claiming them all to be too "mainstream", the Hipster leaves to go to the bathroom by herself. A hand grabs her from behind and she screams too.
4 - The remaining three characters wonder where the Hipster has gone, and find her dead in the bathroom! More accusations are thrown about and some of the characters panic. The Loveable Oaf has a mental breakdown and tries to escape the house, but as he enters the courtyard a gunshot is heard.
5 - The last two, the Nerd and the Flirt, go to the courtyard where they heard the gunshot from, and begin accusing each other since they are the last two left. The Nerd was given the gun, while the Flirt was given the Nunchakus. Since the Flirt heard a gunshot and is scared that she will be next, she is able to use her feminine wiles to cause the Nerd to lower his guard. She swings wildly at the Nerd, but gets shot down easily. Confused about the whole situation, the Nerd begins to leave the mansion, but passes by the dining room and notices Tim's body is no longer there. Then, a dark figure approaches him and reveals himself - it is Tim! When his face is revealed, the Nerd has a flash back to all of the previous people being killed by Tim waiting for them to fall into his traps. Tim asks the Nerd if he will join the dark side or die, and he agrees to join him. Together, they begin laughing manically and plot for another VIZ meeting!
T-Shirt and Poster Ideas:
The design for the T-Shirts and Posters will be minimalist portraits of the characters with their assigned colors showing just their faces and most identifiable features.
Plot for 5 Interstitials:
1 - Five characters are assembled for a VIZ meeting in the dining room of Tim's mansion. They are each given a weapon (Gun, Knife, Nunchakus, Rope, Bread). All of the sudden, the lights go out, the characters hear noises (fumbling and a gunshot), and when the lights return, Tim is found dead. The characters are all confused and begin accusing each other.
2 - During the accusations, the characters begin exploring the mansion a bit. The Jock finds himself in the library, where he is promptly grabbed from behind and screams like a little girl.
3 - When the three remaining characters enter the library, they find the Jock hung by the rope! (only show hanging feet and rope tied to ceiling to keep it PG-13, no face or neck) The characters all turn to look at the Hipster, who had been given the rope, but she exclaims that she had forgotten it in the dining room when the meeting was first assembled! Fed up with the others and claiming them all to be too "mainstream", the Hipster leaves to go to the bathroom by herself. A hand grabs her from behind and she screams too.
4 - The remaining three characters wonder where the Hipster has gone, and find her dead in the bathroom! More accusations are thrown about and some of the characters panic. The Loveable Oaf has a mental breakdown and tries to escape the house, but as he enters the courtyard a gunshot is heard.
5 - The last two, the Nerd and the Flirt, go to the courtyard where they heard the gunshot from, and begin accusing each other since they are the last two left. The Nerd was given the gun, while the Flirt was given the Nunchakus. Since the Flirt heard a gunshot and is scared that she will be next, she is able to use her feminine wiles to cause the Nerd to lower his guard. She swings wildly at the Nerd, but gets shot down easily. Confused about the whole situation, the Nerd begins to leave the mansion, but passes by the dining room and notices Tim's body is no longer there. Then, a dark figure approaches him and reveals himself - it is Tim! When his face is revealed, the Nerd has a flash back to all of the previous people being killed by Tim waiting for them to fall into his traps. Tim asks the Nerd if he will join the dark side or die, and he agrees to join him. Together, they begin laughing manically and plot for another VIZ meeting!
T-Shirt and Poster Ideas:
The design for the T-Shirts and Posters will be minimalist portraits of the characters with their assigned colors showing just their faces and most identifiable features.
POSTER REFERENCE:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)